Dear CGCI Community,
Beyond the devastating realities of active warfronts in places like Ukraine and the Middle East, another theater has been coming into sharper focus: the systems that keep a country running when crises hit. The last year has shown how vulnerable that theater can be. In February, a ransomware attack on Change Healthcare disrupted claims and pharmacy services nationwide, forcing hospitals and clinics to delay care and improvise workarounds as payments stalled and patients struggled to get prescriptions filled. In Mississippi, a separate cyberattack earlier this year led the state’s largest health system to shut down 35 clinics across the state while it rebuilt systems, with the Medusa ransomware group later claiming responsibility. These are far from isolated incidents; recent analyses indicate that a majority of U.S. healthcare organizations have faced ransomware in the past year, with hundreds of attacks on providers and vendors and tens of millions of patients caught in the blast radius.
Our June CGCI Insights opens with “Defense On the Home Front: Why America Must Invest in Civilian Resilience Now,” by national security expert and senior DHS executive Stephanie Dobitsch. Drawing on incidents like Change Healthcare and the Mississippi shutdown, prior attacks on pipelines and local utilities, and years of FEMA disaster response, she argues that these are previews of how the U.S. homeland will be contested in the next major crisis—not as a single “Pearl Harbor” moment, but as compound events where cyber operations, infrastructure failures, and natural disasters stack faster than legacy systems and institutions can respond. Her core point is that the gap between America’s exposure and its preparedness should change how leaders see infrastructure: not as a cost center to be patched after each crisis, but as a national‑security‑grade asset where deliberate, long‑term investment in resilience can both crowd in private capital and reduce systemic risk while creating durable value.
Separately, “How the Brain Computes, and Where Capital Should Follow,” by B. Thomas Edman, Strategy & Technology Lead at Xtremis.AI, looks at a very different frontier: the physics and architecture of AI compute. Edman writes at a moment when the AI buildout has crossed a new threshold, with multiple U.S. data centers expected to hit or exceed one gigawatt of power draw and flagship projects like OpenAI’s Stargate and Meta‘s Hyperion complex symbolizing a wave of AI infrastructure that grid planners warn will take years longer to support than it does to stand up the data halls themselves. He contrasts this with a simple benchmark: a human brain running continuous, multimodal cognition on roughly twenty watts, versus the hundreds of megawatts now being planned for single AI campuses. From there, he argues that what looks like an “energy problem” is fundamentally an architecture problem, and lays out a brain‑inspired compute stack—neuromorphic chips, photonic interconnects, probabilistic and spiking algorithms, and a missing orchestration layer—that could deliver far more capability per watt, especially in environments where power, latency, and security constraints are tightest.
Dobitsch is focused on the “analog layer” of security—grids, hospitals, water, and payments—while Edman is focused on the digital and hardware layer, where new compute architectures will determine how and where advanced AI can safely run. Each essay stands on its own. Together, they frame the problem set at the heart of CGCI’s work: a world in which the resilience of civilian systems and the design of frontier technologies will do as much to shape national power as traditional measures of military strength.
For the Council on Global Competition and Innovation – CGCI and our National Security Research Alliance, this is the center of gravity. On the home front, the work is to help boards, allocators, and operators see incidents like Change Healthcare and the Mississippi shutdown not as unfortunate one‑offs, but as signals about where to harden civilian systems and how to use existing authorities to crowd in private investment before the next shock. On the frontier, the work is to help decision‑makers separate hype from structure in AI: to recognize that the real leverage now sits in the compute and market architectures underneath the current boom, and that the choices made there will shape both economic competitiveness and national security for the next decade.
Thank you for being part of this community—and for the roles you play in steering capital, institutions, and technology through an operating environment that is getting more demanding, not less.
Sincerely,
Christina Alfonso, Executive Director, Council on Global Competition and Innovation – CGCI


